VIS vs. VNQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ).
VIS and VNQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VIS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2004. VNQ is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US REIT Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2004. Both VIS and VNQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VIS or VNQ.
Key characteristics
| VIS | VNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 27.09% | 11.17% |
| 1Y Return | 43.62% | 31.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.92% | -0.70% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.31% | 4.76% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.96% | 6.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.14 | 1.92 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.34 | 2.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.55 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.10 | 1.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.05 | 7.36 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.17% | 4.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.56% | 17.07% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.51% | -73.07% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -8.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and VNQ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VIS vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 27.09% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 11.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 11.96%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VIS vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VIS vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VIS vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than VNQ's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 1.14% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.69% | 1.91% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% | 1.57% | 1.06% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.82% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% | 3.60% | 4.32% |
Drawdowns
VIS vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and VNQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VIS vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.