VID.MC vs. MIDD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vidrala, S.A. (VID.MC) and iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L).
MIDD.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. It was launched on Mar 26, 2004.
Performance
VID.MC vs. MIDD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VID.MC vs. MIDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VID.MC Vidrala, S.A. | -11.18% | 3.48% | 10.15% | 24.53% | -0.67% | -3.02% | 7.68% | 34.85% | -7.28% | 75.43% |
MIDD.L iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF | -2.61% | 6.57% | 12.51% | 10.05% | -22.09% | 23.83% | -10.48% | 36.63% | -14.51% | 12.71% |
Different Trading Currencies
VID.MC is traded in EUR, while MIDD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIDD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VID.MC achieves a -11.18% return, which is significantly lower than MIDD.L's -2.61% return. Over the past 10 years, VID.MC has outperformed MIDD.L with an annualized return of 10.21%, while MIDD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.
VID.MC
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -11.18%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -9.25%
- 3Y*
- -0.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
MIDD.L
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 9.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VID.MC vs. MIDD.L — Risk / Return Rank
VID.MC
MIDD.L
VID.MC vs. MIDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vidrala, S.A. (VID.MC) and iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VID.MC | MIDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | 0.62 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | 0.91 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.13 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 0.85 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 3.18 | -3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VID.MC | MIDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 0.62 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.13 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.22 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.22 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between VID.MC and MIDD.L is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
VID.MC vs. MIDD.L - Dividend Comparison
VID.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than MIDD.L's 3.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VID.MC Vidrala, S.A. | 2.08% | 1.63% | 5.54% | 1.53% | 1.59% | 1.28% | 1.17% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 0.95% | 1.47% | 1.41% |
MIDD.L iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.05% | 3.17% | 2.76% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.72% | 3.07% | 2.80% | 2.67% | 2.80% |
Drawdowns
VID.MC vs. MIDD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VID.MC drawdown since its inception was -106.51%, which is greater than MIDD.L's maximum drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VID.MC and MIDD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VID.MC | MIDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -106.51% | -51.66% | -54.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.07% | -11.54% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -29.93% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.12% | -41.60% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.07% | -8.55% | -59.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.76% | -8.80% | -63.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.15% | 2.94% | +6.21% |
Volatility
VID.MC vs. MIDD.L - Volatility Comparison
Vidrala, S.A. (VID.MC) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) at 5.77%. This indicates that VID.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VID.MC | MIDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 5.77% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 9.33% | +5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.40% | 15.60% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 16.32% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 19.00% | +5.34% |