PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) and Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO).

VGH.TO and CDIV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VGH.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index (CAD-hedged). It was launched on Aug 2, 2013. CDIV.TO is an actively managed fund by Manulife. It was launched on Nov 25, 2020.

Performance

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) and Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VGH.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged		-2.43%11.44%15.35%12.77%-11.08%22.47%2.19%
CDIV.TO
Manulife Smart Dividend ETF		8.54%25.88%15.23%11.77%-2.50%26.20%2.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGH.TO achieves a -2.43% return, which is significantly lower than CDIV.TO's 8.54% return.

VGH.TO

1D
2.09%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
-2.43%
6M
-0.82%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.49%

CDIV.TO

1D
2.90%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
8.54%
6M
10.63%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged

Manulife Smart Dividend ETF

Often compared with VGH.TO:
VGH.TO vs. VDY.TOVGH.TO vs. TQCD.TOVGH.TO vs. SCHDVGH.TO vs. VGG.TOVGH.TO vs. VCN.TOVGH.TO vs. PDIV.TOVGH.TO vs. VBAL.TO
Often compared with CDIV.TO:
CDIV.TO vs. XEI.TOCDIV.TO vs. XDIV.TOCDIV.TO vs. XDG.TOCDIV.TO vs. ZEA.TOCDIV.TO vs. VDY.TOCDIV.TO vs. TBNK.TOCDIV.TO vs. ZDY.TO

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGH.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CDIV.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.

VGH.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged
CDIV.TO
Manulife Smart Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VGH.TO
VGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
CDIV.TO
CDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) and Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VGH.TOCDIV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

2.32

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

2.81

-1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.49

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.50

-2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

15.02

-10.57

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGH.TO and CDIV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VGH.TOCDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.32

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.19

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.35

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between VGH.TO and CDIV.TO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

VGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than CDIV.TO's 1.83% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGH.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged		1.14%1.15%1.28%1.34%1.39%1.22%1.21%1.23%1.58%1.39%1.63%1.81%
CDIV.TO
Manulife Smart Dividend ETF		1.83%3.02%3.41%3.45%3.41%2.38%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, which is greater than CDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGH.TO and CDIV.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

VGH.TOCDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

-16.44%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-9.38%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.34%

-16.44%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.50%

-2.51%

-3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-2.90%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.19%

+0.29%

Volatility

VGH.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) is 4.08%, while Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that VGH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

VGH.TOCDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.22%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

10.63%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

13.79%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

11.96%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

11.93%

+3.82%