VFMV vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
VFMV and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VFMV is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VFMV or BND.
Key characteristics
| VFMV | BND | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.80% | -3.21% |
| 1Y Return | 14.36% | -1.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.29% | -3.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.56% | -0.22% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.47 | -0.26 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.08% | 6.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.64% | -18.84% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.33% | -13.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and BND is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
VFMV vs. BND - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -3.21% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VFMV vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VFMV vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VFMV vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than BND's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.78% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.37% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VFMV vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.84%. This indicates that VFMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.