PortfoliosLab logo
VFMV vs. BND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and BND is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

VFMV vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
88.21%
12.10%
VFMV
BND

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VFMV:

1.18

BND:

1.15

Sortino Ratio

VFMV:

1.65

BND:

1.67

Omega Ratio

VFMV:

1.24

BND:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

VFMV:

1.47

BND:

0.48

Martin Ratio

VFMV:

6.03

BND:

2.93

Ulcer Index

VFMV:

2.52%

BND:

2.06%

Daily Std Dev

VFMV:

12.95%

BND:

5.28%

Max Drawdown

VFMV:

-33.64%

BND:

-18.84%

Current Drawdown

VFMV:

-2.84%

BND:

-6.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 2.68% return.


VFMV

YTD

3.42%

1M

6.96%

6M

0.82%

1Y

13.63%

5Y*

11.99%

10Y*

N/A

BND

YTD

2.68%

1M

0.28%

6M

2.61%

1Y

5.74%

5Y*

-0.75%

10Y*

1.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFMV vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VFMV vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFMV is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFMV is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFMV is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFMV is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFMV is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFMV is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BND is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BND is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BND is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BND is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BND is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BND is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VFMV vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.18
1.15
VFMV
BND

Dividends

VFMV vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than BND's 3.74% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.52%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.74%3.67%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.84%
-6.93%
VFMV
BND

Volatility

VFMV vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.75%. This indicates that VFMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.51%
1.75%
VFMV
BND