PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFIFX vs. SWYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund (VFIFX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFIFX having a 11.34% return and SWYMX slightly higher at 11.71%.


VFIFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.55%
YTD
11.34%
6M
10.70%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
12.05%

SWYMX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.59%
YTD
11.71%
6M
11.02%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFIFX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund
11.34%21.42%14.45%20.39%-17.48%16.42%16.40%24.99%-7.89%19.15%
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
11.71%19.42%14.24%20.92%-17.65%17.80%14.66%25.34%-7.58%20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VFIFX and SWYMX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.98

The correlation between VFIFX and SWYMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFIFX vs. SWYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFIFX
VFIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VFIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VFIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYMX
SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund (VFIFX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFIFXSWYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.13

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

13.72

-0.31

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SWYMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFIFX and SWYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFIFX drawdown since its inception was -51.68%, which is greater than SWYMX's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFIFX and SWYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFIFXSWYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.68%

-30.48%

-21.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.55%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.54%

-14.95%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-25.37%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.41%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-4.49%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.95%

+0.09%

Volatility

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund (VFIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) at 4.50%. This indicates that VFIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFIFXSWYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.50%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

9.73%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

11.89%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.29%

14.82%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

15.64%

-0.49%

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFIFX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYMX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFIFX vs. SWYMX - Dividend Comparison

VFIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than SWYMX's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
1.79%2.00%2.03%1.99%1.96%1.78%1.65%1.96%2.15%1.43%1.22%0.00%
VFIFX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund
1.88%2.09%2.26%2.21%2.38%12.83%1.84%2.20%2.51%0.03%2.04%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VFIFX and SWYMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VFIFX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to SWYMX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFIFX dropped -51.68% vs SWYMX's -30.48%.

VFIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFIFX and SWYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer