VETY.L vs. SCHZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VETY.L) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ).
VETY.L and SCHZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VETY.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. It was launched on Feb 24, 2016. SCHZ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate. It was launched on Jul 14, 2011. Both VETY.L and SCHZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VETY.L or SCHZ.
Key characteristics
| VETY.L | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -5.21% | 3.53% |
| 1Y Return | 0.15% | 10.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.73% | -0.62% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -3.18% | 1.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.07 | 1.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.05 | 2.52 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.99 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.02 | 0.84 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.10 | 6.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.60% | 1.47% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.61% | 6.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.39% | -16.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.07% | -3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VETY.L and SCHZ is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VETY.L vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VETY.L achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 3.53% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VETY.L vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VETY.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VETY.L vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VETY.L) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VETY.L vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
VETY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than SCHZ's 6.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VETY.L Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | 0.77% | 2.11% | 0.54% | 0.09% | 0.17% | 0.60% | 0.63% | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 6.12% | 4.66% | 3.49% | 2.69% | 3.86% | 4.18% | 4.18% | 4.20% | 3.52% | 3.53% | 3.21% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
VETY.L vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VETY.L drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, which is greater than SCHZ's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VETY.L and SCHZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VETY.L vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VETY.L) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) at 1.70%. This indicates that VETY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.