VDPG.L vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
VDPG.L and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VDPG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both VDPG.L and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VDPG.L or VTI.
Key characteristics
| VDPG.L | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.44% | 25.21% |
| 1Y Return | 5.03% | 33.95% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.05% | 8.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.80% | 14.97% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.46 | 2.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.73 | 3.68 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.50 | 4.00 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.93 | 17.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.24% | 1.94% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.64% | 12.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.11% | -55.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.05% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDPG.L and VTI is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VDPG.L vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 25.21% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VDPG.L vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VDPG.L vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VDPG.L vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
VDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
VDPG.L vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VDPG.L vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.05%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.