PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDEA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VDEA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-1.01%11.45%6.35%9.72%-15.28%-1.74%6.10%9.05%
SEMC.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.33%10.24%7.28%7.45%-10.17%0.62%2.59%5.17%
Different Trading Currencies

VDEA.L is traded in USD, while SEMC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEMC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDEA.L achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than SEMC.L's 0.33% return.


VDEA.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.92%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*

SEMC.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
0.33%
6M
2.51%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDEA.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMC.L's 0.42% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDEA.L
VDEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VDEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VDEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMC.L
SEMC.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDEA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDEA.LSEMC.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

2.21

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.73

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.52

17.58

-8.06

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDEA.L and SEMC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDEA.LSEMC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.47

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.46

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between VDEA.L and SEMC.L is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Dividend Comparison

VDEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEMC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VDEA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEMC.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.80%6.51%5.02%5.04%3.98%3.97%4.77%5.18%1.98%

Drawdowns

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDEA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.08%, which is greater than SEMC.L's maximum drawdown of -16.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDEA.L and SEMC.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VDEA.LSEMC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.08%

-12.52%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-3.62%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.08%

-11.89%

-12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.45%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-5.05%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.79%

-0.91%

Volatility

VDEA.L vs. SEMC.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDEA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L) at 1.90%. This indicates that VDEA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEMC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VDEA.LSEMC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

1.90%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

3.35%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

4.91%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.18%

6.05%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.40%

6.44%

+1.96%