UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO).
UTES.TO and CDAY.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTES.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Sep 3, 2024. CDAY.NEO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.
Performance
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 9.57% | 6.79% |
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 3.53% | 14.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than CDAY.NEO's 3.53% return.
UTES.TO
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
UTES.TO
CDAY.NEO
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTES.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTES.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 2.11 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES.TO and CDAY.NEO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, more than CDAY.NEO's 11.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 15.76% | 18.30% | 6.05% |
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 11.51% | 7.87% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, which is greater than CDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and CDAY.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -9.61% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -7.44% | +5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -1.19% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility
UTES.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTES.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 13.26% | -2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 13.26% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 13.26% | -2.14% |