PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UST vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UST vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UST achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, UST has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of -2.13%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


UST

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-4.24%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
-0.51%
5Y*
-6.75%
10Y*
-2.13%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UST vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
-2.88%10.26%-6.19%0.16%-30.19%-7.81%18.83%13.34%-1.09%3.21%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UST and VTI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010

-0.23

The correlation between UST and VTI shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UST vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UST
VTI

Financial Services

97.4%
12.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.7%

Healthcare

-

9.2%

Industrials

-

9.8%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

33.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

UST
97.4%
VTI
12.0%

Basic Materials

UST

-

VTI
2.0%

Communication Services

UST

-

VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UST

-

VTI
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

UST

-

VTI
4.7%

Energy

UST

-

VTI
3.7%

Healthcare

UST

-

VTI
9.2%

Industrials

UST

-

VTI
9.8%

Real Estate

UST

-

VTI
2.4%

Technology

UST

-

VTI
33.5%

Utilities

UST

-

VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UST vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UST
UST Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UST Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UST Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UST vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

3.17

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

14.62

-13.36

UST vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UST Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UST and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.33

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.73

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.82

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.51

-0.31

Drawdowns

UST vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UST drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UST and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

-55.45%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-8.92%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-19.30%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

-25.36%

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.99%

-35.00%

-12.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.33%

-0.72%

-37.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-8.03%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.93%

+1.10%

Volatility

UST vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 3.10% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

2.96%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

9.13%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

12.17%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

17.40%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

18.30%

-5.12%

UST vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

UST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

UST vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

UST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
3.49%3.65%4.09%3.49%0.47%0.27%0.53%1.42%1.71%0.84%0.64%0.75%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


UST and VTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UST has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UST dropped -47.99% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs -2.13% for UST. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UST.

UST has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

UST is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. UST tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UST and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UST and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer