USO vs. SCO
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Oil Fund LP (USO) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO).
USO and SCO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USO is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. It was launched on Apr 10, 2006. SCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. Both USO and SCO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
USO vs. SCO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USO vs. SCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 79.42% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -55.18% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USO achieves a 79.42% return, which is significantly higher than SCO's -55.18% return. Over the past 10 years, USO has outperformed SCO with an annualized return of 5.22%, while SCO has yielded a comparatively lower -39.82% annualized return.
USO
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 42.32%
- YTD
- 79.42%
- 6M
- 69.66%
- 1Y
- 60.99%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
SCO
- 1D
- 5.65%
- 1M
- -31.91%
- YTD
- -55.18%
- 6M
- -50.11%
- 1Y
- -47.55%
- 3Y*
- -29.63%
- 5Y*
- -41.92%
- 10Y*
- -39.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USO vs. SCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SCO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USO vs. SCO — Risk / Return Rank
USO
SCO
USO vs. SCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Oil Fund LP (USO) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USO | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | -0.84 | +2.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | -1.20 | +3.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.87 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | -0.72 | +3.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | -1.71 | +6.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USO | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | -0.84 | +2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.71 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | -0.55 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | -0.36 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between USO and SCO is -0.99. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
USO vs. SCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither USO nor SCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
USO vs. SCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USO drawdown since its inception was -98.19%, roughly equal to the maximum SCO drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USO and SCO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USO | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.19% | -99.74% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.39% | -66.46% | +46.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | -94.53% | +58.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | -99.48% | +12.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.80% | -99.70% | +12.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.21% | -85.03% | +9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 27.84% | -16.07% |
Volatility
USO vs. SCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Oil Fund LP (USO) is 22.21%, while ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a volatility of 24.45%. This indicates that USO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USO | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.21% | 24.45% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.81% | 40.35% | -10.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.35% | 57.03% | -17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 59.08% | -24.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.33% | 71.93% | -33.60% |