USIG vs. SCHZ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ).
USIG and SCHZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USIG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Corporate. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007. SCHZ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate. It was launched on Jul 14, 2011. Both USIG and SCHZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USIG or SCHZ.
Key characteristics
| USIG | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.95% | 4.48% |
| 1Y Return | 15.13% | 13.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.16% | -0.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.08% | 1.25% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.56% | 2.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.35 | 2.01 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.51 | 3.02 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.78 | 0.80 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.90 | 9.71 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.21% | 1.30% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.12% | 6.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.21% | -17.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.02% | -3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between USIG and SCHZ is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
USIG vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, USIG achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than SCHZ's 4.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USIG having a 2.56% annualized return and SCHZ not far ahead at 2.62%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USIG vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USIG and SCHZ have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USIG vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USIG vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
USIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than SCHZ's 4.92% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.27% | 3.94% | 3.14% | 2.33% | 2.82% | 3.37% | 3.44% | 3.03% | 3.14% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 3.53% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.92% | 4.38% | 3.31% | 3.43% | 3.87% | 3.72% | 4.17% | 3.42% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 2.87% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
USIG vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USIG drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, which is greater than SCHZ's maximum drawdown of -17.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIG and SCHZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USIG vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) is 1.25%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that USIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.