PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCGX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCGX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCGX achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.96% return. Over the past 10 years, USCGX has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 11.88%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.


USCGX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.12%
YTD
10.37%
6M
12.08%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
11.88%

VEA

1D
0.63%
1M
5.24%
YTD
15.96%
6M
19.86%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCGX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USCGX
USAA Capital Growth Fund
10.37%21.76%16.31%18.39%-13.44%22.94%10.04%20.13%-11.53%23.88%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.96%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between USCGX and VEA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.91

The correlation between USCGX and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCGX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCGX
USCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
USCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCGX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCGXVEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.10

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.89

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.94

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.42

11.50

+0.91

USCGX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCGX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCGXVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.10

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.59

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.25

+0.03

Drawdowns

USCGX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.08%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCGX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCGXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.08%

-60.68%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-11.63%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-13.45%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.47%

-29.71%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

-35.73%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-13.29%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.98%

-0.74%

Volatility

USCGX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) is 3.64%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that USCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCGXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

5.73%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

13.30%

-3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

15.66%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

16.55%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.36%

+0.67%

USCGX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCGX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCGX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

USCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than VEA's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USCGX
USAA Capital Growth Fund
9.87%10.89%12.63%1.08%7.69%12.56%3.08%9.18%9.40%3.22%1.46%1.13%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, USCGX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to USCGX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCGX dropped -63.08% vs VEA's -60.68%.

USCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCGX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer