USBOX vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

USBOX (Pear Tree Quality Fund) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, USBOX returned 13.78%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for MOAT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USBOX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

USBOX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBOX achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USBOX having a 13.78% annualized return and MOAT not far behind at 13.76%.

USBOX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 13.78%

MOAT

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: -1.37%
• 6M: -2.45%
• 1Y: 11.95%
• 3Y*: 10.75%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBOX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund	2.94%	15.77%	17.99%	29.20%	-16.25%	16.50%	18.06%	31.18%	-1.97%	28.49%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-1.37%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between USBOX and MOAT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012	0.83

The correlation between USBOX and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

USBOX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBOX

USBOX Risk / Return Rank: 21
USBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
USBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
USBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
USBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
USBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBOX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USBOX	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.86	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	1.31	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.15	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	0.97	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.81	2.89	+1.91

USBOX vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBOX and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USBOX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	USBOX	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.67%	-33.31%	-32.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.76%	-12.43%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.41%	-21.44%	+6.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.42%	-23.96%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.42%	-33.31%	+2.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.77%	-5.14%	+2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.08%	-3.83%	-13.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	4.14%	-0.86%

Volatility

USBOX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) is 4.01%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that USBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USBOX	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	4.73%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	10.28%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	14.00%	-1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	18.24%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	18.65%	-1.50%

USBOX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

USBOX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.34%, more than MOAT's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.37%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund	28.34%	29.17%	8.71%	4.37%	14.55%	0.88%	7.47%	19.65%	15.43%	6.92%	6.19%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USBOX and MOAT in my portfolio?

USBOX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USBOX or MOAT?

MOAT has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to USBOX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBOX dropped -65.67% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USBOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.