USBOX vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
USBOX is managed by Pear Tree Funds. It was launched on May 6, 1985. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012.
Performance
USBOX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USBOX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund | -6.87% | 15.77% | 17.99% | 29.20% | -16.25% | 16.50% | 18.06% | 31.18% | -1.97% | 28.49% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -6.87% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with USBOX at -6.87% and MOAT at -6.87%. Over the past 10 years, USBOX has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 12.50%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.
USBOX
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- 8.68%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
MOAT
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USBOX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USBOX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
USBOX
MOAT
USBOX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USBOX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 0.98 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.83 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 3.12 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USBOX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.44 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.72 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.75 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between USBOX and MOAT is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USBOX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.32%, more than MOAT's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund | 31.32% | 29.17% | 8.71% | 4.37% | 14.55% | 0.88% | 7.47% | 19.65% | 15.43% | 6.92% | 6.19% | 12.85% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.46% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
USBOX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and MOAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USBOX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.67% | -33.31% | -32.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -13.30% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.42% | -23.96% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | -33.31% | +2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -10.42% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.17% | -3.80% | -13.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.55% | -0.24% |
Volatility
USBOX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.78%. This indicates that USBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USBOX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 4.78% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 10.10% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 19.76% | -3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 18.09% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 18.71% | -1.60% |