PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNM vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unum Group (UNM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNM achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, UNM has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 12.49%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


UNM

1D
-0.78%
1M
4.08%
YTD
9.05%
6M
14.91%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
25.44%
10Y*
12.49%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNM
Unum Group
9.05%8.56%66.31%13.72%73.56%11.87%-16.22%2.63%-45.22%27.19%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UNM and VTI is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between UNM and VTI has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNM
UNM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unum Group (UNM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UNMVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

2.33

-2.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.38

3.18

-2.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.42

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

3.17

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.56

14.62

-14.06

UNM vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNM and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNMVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

2.33

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.73

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.82

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.51

-0.28

Drawdowns

UNM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNM drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNM and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNMVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.38%

-55.45%

-33.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.04%

-8.92%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-19.30%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.28%

-25.36%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.06%

-35.00%

-46.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-0.72%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.69%

-8.03%

-24.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.39%

1.93%

+5.46%

Volatility

UNM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Unum Group (UNM) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that UNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNMVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.96%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

9.13%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.67%

12.17%

+12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.21%

17.40%

+12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.62%

18.30%

+19.32%

Dividends

UNM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

UNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UNM
Unum Group
2.20%2.27%2.15%3.07%3.07%4.76%4.97%3.74%3.34%1.57%1.75%2.10%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNM and VTI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNM has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNM dropped -89.38% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNM and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer