PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMDV.AS vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Medical Devices UCITS ETF (UMDV.AS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UMDV.AS
iShares US Medical Devices UCITS ETF
-14.69%7.40%11.19%4.39%-20.14%23.03%12.03%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
8.35%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%-8.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDV.AS achieves a -14.69% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 8.35% return.


UMDV.AS

1D
-0.34%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-14.69%
6M
-10.79%
1Y
-11.74%
3Y*
1.42%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*

GLD

1D
-1.92%
1M
-8.27%
YTD
8.35%
6M
21.03%
1Y
49.02%
3Y*
32.51%
5Y*
21.53%
10Y*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDV.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UMDV.AS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDV.AS
UMDV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
UMDV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Medical Devices UCITS ETF (UMDV.AS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMDV.ASGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.65

1.77

-2.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.81

2.19

-3.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.32

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.57

-2.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.45

9.28

-9.72

UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDV.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDV.AS and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMDV.ASGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

1.77

-2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.22

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.62

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between UMDV.AS and GLD is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither UMDV.AS nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDV.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.59%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDV.AS and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UMDV.ASGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.59%

-45.56%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.72%

-19.21%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.59%

-21.03%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.89%

-13.41%

-4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-16.17%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

5.32%

+0.40%

Volatility

UMDV.AS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Medical Devices UCITS ETF (UMDV.AS) is 5.64%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that UMDV.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UMDV.ASGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

10.54%

-4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

24.43%

-13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.00%

27.89%

-9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

17.76%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

15.89%

+2.60%