UJUL vs. ZMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR).
UJUL and ZMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UJUL is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. ZMAR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 3, 2025.
Performance
UJUL vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UJUL vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July | -0.61% | 12.26% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.53% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UJUL achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than ZMAR's 0.53% return.
UJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 13.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMAR
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 6.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UJUL vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UJUL and ZMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Return for Risk
UJUL vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank
UJUL
ZMAR
UJUL vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UJUL | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 2.24 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 3.54 | -1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.53 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.76 | -1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 18.70 | -7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UJUL | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.24 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.88 | -1.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between UJUL and ZMAR is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UJUL vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither UJUL nor ZMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.43% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UJUL vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, which is greater than ZMAR's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJUL and ZMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UJUL | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -2.30% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -1.44% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -0.58% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -0.25% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 0.39% | +0.96% |
Volatility
UJUL vs. ZMAR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) at 1.19%. This indicates that UJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UJUL | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 1.19% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 1.67% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 3.11% | +7.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 3.20% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 3.20% | +5.82% |