UCON vs. OBND

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UCON (First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF) and OBND (SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UCON returned 5.89%/yr vs 6.84%/yr for OBND. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UCON charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for OBND.

Performance

UCON vs. OBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) and SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCON achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than OBND's 1.47% return.

UCON

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: 5.89%
• 5Y*: 2.78%
• 10Y*: —

OBND

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 5.74%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCON vs. OBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UCON First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF	0.76%	7.00%	4.69%	7.72%	-5.72%	-0.31%
OBND SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF	1.47%	7.85%	4.80%	9.47%	-11.24%	0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between UCON and OBND is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021	0.64

The correlation between UCON and OBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UCON vs. OBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCON

UCON Risk / Return Rank: 50
UCON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
UCON Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
UCON Omega Ratio Rank: 53
UCON Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
UCON Martin Ratio Rank: 49

OBND

OBND Risk / Return Rank: 52
OBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
OBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
OBND Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
OBND Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCON vs. OBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) and SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UCON	OBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.66	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.47	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.31	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.00	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.85	8.70	-0.85

UCON vs. OBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCON Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the OBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCON and OBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UCON vs. OBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCON drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, roughly equal to the maximum OBND drawdown of -15.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCON and OBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	UCON	OBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-15.86%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.45%	-2.88%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.85%	-3.17%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.27%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-4.36%	+2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.64%	0.66%	-0.02%

Volatility

UCON vs. OBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) is 0.85%, while SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that UCON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UCON	OBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	1.13%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.37%	2.79%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99%	3.48%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.90%	4.66%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.88%	4.66%	+1.22%

UCON vs. OBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCON has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than OBND's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

UCON vs. OBND - Dividend Comparison

UCON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than OBND's 6.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OBND SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF	6.27%	6.26%	6.53%	6.01%	4.56%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UCON First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF	4.66%	4.63%	4.95%	4.75%	3.12%	2.20%	3.14%	3.25%	1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UCON and OBND in my portfolio?

UCON and OBND have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UCON or OBND?

OBND has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to UCON (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCON dropped -15.31% vs OBND's -15.86%.

Which ETF is better, UCON or OBND?

On 3-year performance, OBND leads with 6.84% vs 5.89% for UCON. On fees, OBND is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, UCON has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UCON or OBND?

Over the 3-year period, OBND has performed better with a 6.84% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UCON or OBND?

OBND is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for UCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UCON or OBND?

OBND has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 4.66% for UCON.

What is the main difference between UCON and OBND?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for UCON and 0.55% for OBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.