UC48.L vs. FLRK.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L).
UC48.L and FLRK.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC48.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Aug 20, 2012. FLRK.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both UC48.L and FLRK.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC48.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.87% | 23.58% | 13.94% | -1.31% | -10.09% | -4.06% | 20.65% | 8.60% |
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 28.58% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | -14.15% |
Different Trading Currencies
UC48.L is traded in GBp, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC48.L achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 28.58% return.
UC48.L
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FLRK.L
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 28.58%
- 6M
- 55.27%
- 1Y
- 125.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC48.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC48.L
FLRK.L
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC48.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 3.98 | -2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 4.34 | -2.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.61 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 6.24 | -3.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 23.50 | -13.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC48.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 3.98 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.41 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.40 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between UC48.L and FLRK.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UC48.L nor FLRK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC48.L drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, smaller than the maximum FLRK.L drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC48.L and FLRK.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC48.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.18% | -41.57% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -21.18% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -38.88% | +11.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -16.92% | +7.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -20.35% | +8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 5.63% | -2.48% |
Volatility
UC48.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L) is 7.07%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that UC48.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UC48.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 16.60% | -9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 27.44% | -14.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 31.33% | -13.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 23.26% | -6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 26.16% | -8.24% |