PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UC13.L vs. XDPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L).

UC13.L and XDPP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC13.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Aug 5, 2025. XDPP.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. Both UC13.L and XDPP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		-3.13%9.50%27.24%19.65%2.62%
XDPP.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C		-3.12%9.44%27.26%19.81%2.54%
Different Trading Currencies

UC13.L is traded in GBp, while XDPP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XDPP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UC13.L having a -3.13% return and XDPP.L slightly higher at -3.12%.

UC13.L

1D
1.60%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
-3.13%
6M
0.20%
1Y
14.80%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
14.57%

XDPP.L

1D
1.62%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-3.12%
6M
0.20%
1Y
14.80%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis

Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C

Often compared with UC13.L:
UC13.L vs. VUSA.LUC13.L vs. VOOUC13.L vs. SPYUC13.L vs. CSPX.LUC13.L vs. SPXP.LUC13.L vs. I500.LUC13.L vs. IISU.L
Often compared with XDPP.L:
XDPP.L vs. CSPX.ASXDPP.L vs. CSPX.LXDPP.L vs. VOOXDPP.L vs. EQQQ.LXDPP.L vs. IUSA.LXDPP.L vs. VUAA.DEXDPP.L vs. CNDX.L

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC13.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XDPP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XDPP.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis

Return for Risk

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
XDPP.L
XDPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UC13.LXDPP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.97

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.40

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.01

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.85

6.86

-0.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC13.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC13.L and XDPP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UC13.LXDPP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.97

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.01

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between UC13.L and XDPP.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Dividend Comparison

UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while XDPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		1.08%0.96%0.99%1.16%1.22%0.94%1.36%1.44%1.55%1.51%1.55%1.52%
XDPP.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC13.L drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than XDPP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC13.L and XDPP.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

UC13.LXDPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.59%

-20.98%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

-10.54%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.59%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-4.93%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-3.61%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.13%

+0.01%

Volatility

UC13.L vs. XDPP.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

UC13.LXDPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.76%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

8.32%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

15.27%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

14.06%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

14.06%

+1.68%