TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO).
TULV.TO and XMS.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TULV.TO is an actively managed fund by TD. It was launched on May 26, 2020. XMS.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2016.
Performance
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TULV.TO TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 3.26% | 3.62% | 23.74% | -3.31% | 2.02% | 23.84% | 0.90% |
XMS.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -4.17% | 3.71% | 14.23% | 7.84% | -11.15% | 21.02% | 8.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TULV.TO achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly higher than XMS.TO's -4.17% return.
TULV.TO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XMS.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 6M
- -6.72%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TULV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XMS.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TULV.TO
XMS.TO
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TULV.TO | XMS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | -0.40 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | -0.46 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.93 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | -0.65 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | -2.33 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TULV.TO | XMS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | -0.40 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.41 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.51 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between TULV.TO and XMS.TO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Dividend Comparison
TULV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than XMS.TO's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TULV.TO TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 1.77% | 1.80% | 1.48% | 1.96% | 1.57% | 1.37% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMS.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.20% | 0.99% | 1.66% | 1.40% | 1.54% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TULV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum XMS.TO drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TULV.TO and XMS.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TULV.TO | XMS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -36.48% | +24.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -8.50% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -19.23% | +7.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -6.91% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -4.28% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 2.35% | +3.28% |
Volatility
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Volatility Comparison
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TULV.TO | XMS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 3.08% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 6.77% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 12.14% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.01% | 12.12% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.58% | 14.76% | -3.18% |