PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
3.26%3.62%23.74%-3.31%2.02%23.84%0.90%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-4.17%3.71%14.23%7.84%-11.15%21.02%8.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TULV.TO achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly higher than XMS.TO's -4.17% return.


TULV.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.11%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*

XMS.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
-4.17%
6M
-6.72%
1Y
-5.06%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TULV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XMS.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TULV.TO
TULV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TULV.TOXMS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

-0.40

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.03

-0.46

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.93

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

-0.65

+0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.09

-2.33

+2.42

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TULV.TO and XMS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TULV.TOXMS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

-0.40

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.41

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.51

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between TULV.TO and XMS.TO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Dividend Comparison

TULV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than XMS.TO's 1.25% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
1.77%1.80%1.48%1.96%1.57%1.37%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.25%1.08%1.21%1.38%1.20%0.99%1.66%1.40%1.54%1.53%1.43%

Drawdowns

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TULV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum XMS.TO drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TULV.TO and XMS.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TULV.TOXMS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-36.48%

+24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-8.50%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

-19.23%

+7.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

-6.91%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-4.28%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

2.35%

+3.28%

Volatility

TULV.TO vs. XMS.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TULV.TOXMS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

3.08%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

6.77%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

12.14%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.01%

12.12%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.58%

14.76%

-3.18%