PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
3.08%2.13%
TEQT.TO
TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio
0.54%27.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TULV.TO achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than TEQT.TO's 0.54% return.


TULV.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
3.08%
6M
2.75%
1Y
-0.32%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*

TEQT.TO

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
0.54%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TULV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQT.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TULV.TO
TULV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQT.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TULV.TOTEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.23

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TULV.TOTEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

2.35

-1.59

Correlation

The correlation between TULV.TO and TEQT.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

TULV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than TEQT.TO's 1.46% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
1.77%1.80%1.48%1.96%1.57%1.37%0.83%
TEQT.TO
TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio
1.46%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TULV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than TEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TULV.TO and TEQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TULV.TOTEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-7.62%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-3.96%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-1.06%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.04%

Volatility

TULV.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TULV.TOTEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

12.42%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.01%

12.42%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.57%

12.42%

-0.85%