TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF (TTTX.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO).

TTTX.TO and ZEQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TTTX.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Mirae Asset Global Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index. It was launched on May 14, 2024. ZEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Jan 24, 2022.

Performance

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF (TTTX.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TTTX.TO Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF	-5.40%	18.31%	21.44%
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF	1.00%	19.67%	12.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTTX.TO achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than ZEQT.TO's 1.00% return.

TTTX.TO

• 1D: 3.50%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: -5.40%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZEQT.TO

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.85%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 21.48%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTTX.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

TTTX.TO

Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF

ZEQT.TO

BMO All-Equity ETF

Return for Risk

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTTX.TO

TTTX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
TTTX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TTTX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TTTX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TTTX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
TTTX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ZEQT.TO

ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF (TTTX.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTTX.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.32	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.84	-0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.28	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	1.79	-0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.15	7.62	-2.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTTX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTTX.TO and ZEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTTX.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	1.32	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	1.02	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between TTTX.TO and ZEQT.TO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

TTTX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ZEQT.TO's 1.44% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TTTX.TO Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF	0.11%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF	1.44%	1.45%	1.69%	2.13%	2.43%

Drawdowns

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTTX.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than ZEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTTX.TO and ZEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTTX.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.27%	-16.87%	-6.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.59%	-11.90%	-1.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.58%	-5.31%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-3.09%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	2.80%	+1.59%

Volatility

TTTX.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF (TTTX.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) at 5.48%. This indicates that TTTX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTTX.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.80%	5.48%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	10.03%	+2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.35%	16.40%	+5.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.11%	13.78%	+7.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	13.78%	+7.33%