PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTRIX vs. FFLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund (TTRIX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTRIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund
-5.34%18.93%14.46%20.24%-17.79%16.55%17.51%26.37%-9.93%20.90%
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
-4.20%21.48%14.18%19.93%-17.32%15.93%16.52%26.02%-7.16%20.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTRIX achieves a -5.34% return, which is significantly lower than FFLDX's -4.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TTRIX having a 10.05% annualized return and FFLDX not far ahead at 10.54%.


TTRIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-5.34%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
10.05%

FFLDX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-8.59%
YTD
-4.20%
6M
-1.30%
1Y
16.53%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTRIX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLDX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

TTRIX vs. FFLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTRIX
TTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLDX
FFLDX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FFLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund (TTRIX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTRIXFFLDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.09

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.60

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.37

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.01

6.35

-1.33

TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the FFLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTRIX and FFLDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTRIXFFLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.09

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.56

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.70

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.63

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between TTRIX and FFLDX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Dividend Comparison

TTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than FFLDX's 2.08% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTRIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund
6.88%6.52%3.91%1.88%8.28%10.18%5.68%5.23%4.77%0.79%3.41%3.02%
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
2.08%2.00%2.02%1.96%3.04%1.99%1.91%10.83%2.39%1.97%2.42%2.32%

Drawdowns

TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTRIX drawdown since its inception was -32.75%, which is greater than FFLDX's maximum drawdown of -30.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTRIX and FFLDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TTRIXFFLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.75%

-30.72%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-10.82%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.87%

-26.18%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.75%

-30.72%

-2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.43%

-9.06%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-4.62%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.34%

+0.19%

Volatility

TTRIX vs. FFLDX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund (TTRIX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) have volatilities of 4.87% and 5.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TTRIXFFLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

5.03%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

8.79%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

15.21%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

14.30%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

15.09%

+1.05%