PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (TSLY.TO) and BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLY.TO achieves a -18.63% return, which is significantly lower than ZWC.TO's 6.38% return.


TSLY.TO

1D
1.65%
1M
-9.10%
YTD
-18.63%
6M
-15.64%
1Y
44.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZWC.TO

1D
1.51%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
6.38%
6M
12.84%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWC.TO's 0.91% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLY.TO
TSLY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TSLY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ZWC.TO
ZWC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZWC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (TSLY.TO) and BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLY.TOZWC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

2.70

-1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

3.45

-1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.58

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.15

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.90

16.47

-12.56

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the ZWC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLY.TO and ZWC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLY.TOZWC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.70

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.53

-0.78

Correlation

The correlation between TSLY.TO and ZWC.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Dividend Comparison

TSLY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.35%, more than ZWC.TO's 5.72% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSLY.TO
Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
40.35%32.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWC.TO
BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF
5.72%5.92%6.73%7.62%7.01%6.60%8.15%6.92%7.11%5.46%

Drawdowns

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLY.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than ZWC.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY.TO and ZWC.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLY.TOZWC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-40.57%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.25%

-8.93%

-17.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.44%

-2.63%

-24.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.81%

-4.76%

-23.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.93%

1.71%

+9.22%

Volatility

TSLY.TO vs. ZWC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Tesla Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (TSLY.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) at 3.93%. This indicates that TSLY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLY.TOZWC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.28%

3.93%

+7.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.49%

6.60%

+22.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.76%

10.17%

+46.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.46%

10.09%

+52.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.46%

15.04%

+47.42%