PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
-14.42%40.52%15.49%
AMZD.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP
-19.63%4.58%14.80%
Different Trading Currencies

TSLI.L is traded in USD, while AMZD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMZD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLI.L achieves a -14.42% return, which is significantly higher than AMZD.L's -19.63% return.


TSLI.L

1D
0.65%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-14.42%
6M
1.95%
1Y
73.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZD.L

1D
1.70%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
-19.63%
6M
-17.74%
1Y
-3.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSLI.L and AMZD.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLI.L
TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZD.L
AMZD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLI.LAMZD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

-0.13

+1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

0.03

+2.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.00

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

-0.23

+3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

-0.59

+8.68

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLI.L and AMZD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLI.LAMZD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

-0.13

+1.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

-0.08

+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between TSLI.L and AMZD.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Dividend Comparison

TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.54%, more than AMZD.L's 15.44% yield.


TTM20252024
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
84.54%73.68%19.21%
AMZD.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP
15.44%14.03%2.37%

Drawdowns

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than AMZD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLI.L and AMZD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLI.LAMZD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.20%

-29.73%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.29%

-28.42%

+8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.77%

-27.14%

+7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-11.80%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.83%

11.78%

-3.95%

Volatility

TSLI.L vs. AMZD.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) at 8.15%. This indicates that TSLI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLI.LAMZD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

8.15%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.81%

22.07%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.75%

29.69%

+10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.16%

28.24%

+14.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.16%

28.24%

+14.92%