PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSHA vs. OLMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSHA vs. OLMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSHA achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than OLMA's -54.20% return.


TSHA

1D
-0.26%
1M
-10.26%
6M
29.93%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
122.81%
3Y*
105.27%
5Y*
-19.46%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-20.40%

OLMA

1D
-3.13%
1M
-9.41%
6M
-55.48%
YTD
-54.20%
1Y
114.82%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
-13.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.29M$12.39M$17.04M
$12.94M$17.27M$18.69M

TSHA vs. OLMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TSHA
Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.
6.55%217.92%-2.26%-21.68%-80.60%-56.10%26.38%
OLMA
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-54.20%328.82%-58.45%472.65%-73.82%-80.53%6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TSHA and OLMA is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TSHA:

$1.87B

OLMA:

$1.00B

EPS

TSHA:

-$0.37

OLMA:

-$1.98

PB Ratio

TSHA:

10.14

OLMA:

2.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSHA:

$7.47M

OLMA:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSHA:

$6.89M

OLMA:

-$187.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

TSHA:

-$130.51M

OLMA:

-$197.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSHA vs. OLMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSHA
TSHA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TSHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSHA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TSHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

OLMA
OLMA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
OLMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLMA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
OLMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSHA vs. OLMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSHAOLMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.66

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

2.87

+4.50

TSHA vs. OLMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSHA Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the OLMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSHA and OLMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSHA vs. OLMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSHA drawdown since its inception was -98.14%, roughly equal to the maximum OLMA drawdown of -96.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSHA and OLMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSHAOLMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.14%

-96.26%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.13%

-74.35%

+43.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.90%

-82.15%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.26%

-93.36%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.54%

-78.99%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.92%

-75.06%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.61%

42.93%

-27.32%

Volatility

TSHA vs. OLMA - Volatility Comparison

Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) has a higher volatility of 23.33% compared to Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) at 13.68%. This indicates that TSHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OLMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSHAOLMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.33%

13.68%

+9.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.71%

51.96%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.03%

160.11%

-70.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.69%

107.79%

+28.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

129.49%

105.35%

+24.14%

Dividends

TSHA vs. OLMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSHA nor OLMA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TSHA vs. OLMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TSHA and OLMA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSHA has higher volatility (23.33%) compared to OLMA (13.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSHA dropped -98.14% vs OLMA's -96.26%.

TSHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSHA and OLMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer