PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TREE vs. LC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TREELC
YTD Return59.80%73.00%
1Y Return193.81%163.41%
3Y Return (Ann)-30.30%-29.80%
5Y Return (Ann)-33.47%2.25%
Sharpe Ratio2.563.14
Sortino Ratio3.094.03
Omega Ratio1.391.46
Calmar Ratio2.091.74
Martin Ratio18.2819.55
Ulcer Index11.01%8.55%
Daily Std Dev78.48%53.18%
Max Drawdown-97.59%-96.84%
Current Drawdown-88.82%-89.16%

Fundamentals


TREELC
Market Cap$721.68M$1.76B
EPS-$2.72$0.46
PEG Ratio3.55-18.14
Total Revenue (TTM)$773.05M$1.16B
Gross Profit (TTM)$720.32M$756.22M
EBITDA (TTM)-$5.51M$244.67M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between TREE and LC is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TREE vs. LC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TREE achieves a 59.80% return, which is significantly lower than LC's 73.00% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.30%
61.38%
TREE
LC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TREE vs. LC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) and LendingClub Corporation (LC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TREE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TREE, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TREE, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TREE, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TREE, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TREE, currently valued at 18.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0018.28
LC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LC, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LC, currently valued at 4.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LC, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LC, currently valued at 19.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.55

TREE vs. LC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREE Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the LC Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREE and LC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.56
3.14
TREE
LC

Dividends

TREE vs. LC - Dividend Comparison

Neither TREE nor LC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TREE vs. LC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREE drawdown since its inception was -97.59%, roughly equal to the maximum LC drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREE and LC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-88.82%
-89.16%
TREE
LC

Volatility

TREE vs. LC - Volatility Comparison

LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) has a higher volatility of 31.12% compared to LendingClub Corporation (LC) at 18.00%. This indicates that TREE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
31.12%
18.00%
TREE
LC

Financials

TREE vs. LC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingTree, Inc. and LendingClub Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items