TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO).

TQQQ.TO and HSAV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TQQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2025. HSAV.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020.

Performance

TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF	-21.77%	41.06%
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF	1.13%	1.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ.TO achieves a -21.77% return, which is significantly lower than HSAV.TO's 1.13% return.

TQQQ.TO

• 1D: 10.02%
• 1M: -16.10%
• YTD: -21.77%
• 6M: -20.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HSAV.TO

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.11%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: 3.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSAV.TO

Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF

Return for Risk

TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSAV.TO

HSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
HSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
HSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQQQ.TO	HSAV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.77	-1.49

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither TQQQ.TO nor HSAV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TQQQ.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ.TO and HSAV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ.TO	HSAV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.15%	-2.18%	-35.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.96%	0.00%	-31.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-0.19%	-8.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ.TO	HSAV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.10%	1.37%	+45.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.10%	1.75%	+45.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.10%	1.58%	+45.52%