TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO).

TQQQ.TO and HEQL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TQQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2025. HEQL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 10, 2023.

Performance

TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF	-21.77%	41.06%
HEQL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD	0.05%	19.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ.TO achieves a -21.77% return, which is significantly lower than HEQL.TO's 0.05% return.

TQQQ.TO

• 1D: 10.02%
• 1M: -16.10%
• YTD: -21.77%
• 6M: -20.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HEQL.TO

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -5.59%
• YTD: 0.05%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQL.TO

Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD

Return for Risk

TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQL.TO

HEQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 59
HEQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
HEQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
HEQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
HEQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HEQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD (HEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQQQ.TO	HEQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.70	-1.42

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ.TO and HEQL.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HEQL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF CAD	1.67%	1.82%	1.75%	0.55%

Drawdowns

TQQQ.TO vs. HEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, which is greater than HEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ.TO and HEQL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ.TO	HEQL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.15%	-19.86%	-18.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.96%	-6.79%	-25.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-1.91%	-7.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ.TO	HEQL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.10%	21.32%	+25.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.10%	18.57%	+28.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.10%	18.57%	+28.53%