TNA vs. SQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ).
TNA and SQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TNA is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (300%). It was launched on Nov 5, 2008. SQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both TNA and SQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TNA or SQQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between TNA and SQQQ is -0.70. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
TNA vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TNA:
0.26
SQQQ:
-1.02
TNA:
0.80
SQQQ:
-1.70
TNA:
1.10
SQQQ:
0.82
TNA:
0.23
SQQQ:
-0.55
TNA:
1.22
SQQQ:
-1.44
TNA:
13.37%
SQQQ:
37.93%
TNA:
62.24%
SQQQ:
53.54%
TNA:
-88.09%
SQQQ:
-100.00%
TNA:
-60.73%
SQQQ:
-100.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -52.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 0.90%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -52.39% annualized return.
TNA
9.32%
-16.09%
21.05%
7.79%
-9.65%
0.90%
SQQQ
-52.49%
-7.91%
-25.07%
-52.77%
-58.79%
-52.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNA vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TNA vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TNA vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SQQQ's 7.71% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.49% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.59% | 1.53% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 7.71% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TNA vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and SQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TNA vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a higher volatility of 18.78% compared to ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) at 15.39%. This indicates that TNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.