TM vs. MCD
TM (Toyota Motor Corporation) and MCD (McDonald's Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — TM in Auto Manufacturers, MCD in Restaurants. Over the past 10 years, TM returned 8.55%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for MCD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TM vs. MCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TM achieves a -15.81% return, which is significantly lower than MCD's -9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TM has underperformed MCD with an annualized return of 8.55%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.10% annualized return.
TM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -15.81%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- 1Y
- -4.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
MCD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -9.47%
- 6M
- -10.08%
- 1Y
- -10.39%
- 3Y*
- 0.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
TM vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | -15.81% | 13.82% | 8.88% | 38.23% | -24.43% | 23.21% | 13.62% | 22.69% | -5.81% | 12.10% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -9.47% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TM and MCD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 1976 | 0.19 |
The correlation between TM and MCD shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TM:
$234.89B
MCD:
$194.99B
TM:
$2.98K
MCD:
$12.13
TM:
0.06
MCD:
22.53
TM:
0.00
MCD:
3.62
TM:
0.00
MCD:
7.12
TM:
$51.16T
MCD:
$27.45B
TM:
$8.54T
MCD:
$12.10B
TM:
$7.11T
MCD:
$14.46B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TM vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank
TM
MCD
TM vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TM | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.91 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | -0.55 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -1.45 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TM | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | -0.64 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.33 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.55 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
TM vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TM drawdown since its inception was -60.15%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TM and MCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TM | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.15% | -73.20% | +13.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.42% | -19.04% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.92% | -19.04% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.80% | -19.04% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.80% | -36.90% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | -18.88% | -8.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.99% | -14.89% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 7.23% | +3.52% |
Volatility
TM vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison
Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to McDonald's Corporation (MCD) at 4.79%. This indicates that TM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TM | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 4.79% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.34% | 12.06% | +8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.19% | 16.41% | +12.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 17.24% | +9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 20.39% | +3.24% |
Dividends
TM vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison
TM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than MCD's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.69% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | 1.59% | 2.95% | 2.81% | 2.45% | 2.90% | 2.45% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 3.40% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 5.59% |
Financials
TM vs. MCD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Toyota Motor Corporation and McDonald's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TM vs. MCD - Profitability Comparison
TM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.
MCD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
MCD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported an operating income of 2.95B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.
TM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
MCD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TM and MCD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TM has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to MCD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TM dropped -60.15% vs MCD's -73.20%.
TM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TM and MCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer