PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Tesla Inc (TL0.DE) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TL0.DE
Tesla Inc
-16.43%-2.91%97.18%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
-12.33%23.84%34.48%
Different Trading Currencies

TL0.DE is traded in EUR, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TL0.DE achieves a -16.43% return, which is significantly lower than TSLI.L's -12.33% return.


TL0.DE

1D
4.00%
1M
-4.17%
YTD
-16.43%
6M
-15.17%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
37.15%

TSLI.L

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
-12.33%
6M
1.14%
1Y
53.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TL0.DE
TL0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TL0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TL0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TL0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TL0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TL0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLI.L
TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla Inc (TL0.DE) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TL0.DETSLI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.59

1.35

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.91

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.88

-1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.46

6.47

-4.01

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TL0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TL0.DE and TSLI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TL0.DETSLI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.35

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.59

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between TL0.DE and TSLI.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison

TL0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 72.52%.


TTM20252024
TL0.DE
Tesla Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
72.52%73.68%19.21%

Drawdowns

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TL0.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, which is greater than TSLI.L's maximum drawdown of -44.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TL0.DE and TSLI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TL0.DETSLI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.68%

-41.20%

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.63%

-20.29%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.68%

-19.06%

-9.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.22%

-11.63%

-11.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.83%

7.89%

+3.94%

Volatility

TL0.DE vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison

Tesla Inc (TL0.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) at 8.95%. This indicates that TL0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TL0.DETSLI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

8.95%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.71%

23.23%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.16%

40.21%

+10.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.71%

43.77%

+10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.95%

43.77%

+12.18%