PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Titan Company Limited (TITAN.NS) and Trent Limited (TRENT.NS).

Performance

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in Titan Company Limited (TITAN.NS) and Trent Limited (TRENT.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TITAN.NS
Titan Company Limited		0.35%24.92%-11.20%41.96%3.34%61.34%32.43%28.18%8.96%163.85%
TRENT.NS
Trent Limited		-17.59%-39.88%133.33%126.40%27.10%54.99%30.66%45.92%7.82%68.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TITAN.NS achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than TRENT.NS's -17.59% return. Over the past 10 years, TITAN.NS has underperformed TRENT.NS with an annualized return of 28.61%, while TRENT.NS has yielded a comparatively higher 36.49% annualized return.

TITAN.NS

1D
2.89%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
0.35%
6M
19.28%
1Y
36.52%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
21.50%
10Y*
28.61%

TRENT.NS

1D
6.90%
1M
-8.37%
YTD
-17.59%
6M
-27.02%
1Y
-36.71%
3Y*
37.02%
5Y*
36.40%
10Y*
36.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Titan Company Limited

Trent Limited

Often compared with TITAN.NS:
TITAN.NS vs. NFTYTITAN.NS vs. MSFTTITAN.NS vs. DMART.NS
Often compared with TRENT.NS:
TRENT.NS vs. DMART.NSTRENT.NS vs. ^NIFTY200TRENT.NS vs. NVDATRENT.NS vs. AAPLTRENT.NS vs. FXAIXTRENT.NS vs. MSFT

Return for Risk

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TITAN.NS
TITAN.NS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TITAN.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TITAN.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TITAN.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TITAN.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TITAN.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
TRENT.NS
TRENT.NS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TRENT.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRENT.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRENT.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TRENT.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRENT.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Titan Company Limited (TITAN.NS) and Trent Limited (TRENT.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TITAN.NSTRENT.NSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

-1.03

+2.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

-1.36

+3.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.81

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

-0.64

+3.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.78

-1.20

+8.98

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TITAN.NS Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the TRENT.NS Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TITAN.NS and TRENT.NS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TITAN.NSTRENT.NSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

-1.03

+2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

1.09

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

1.04

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.36

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between TITAN.NS and TRENT.NS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Dividend Comparison

TITAN.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than TRENT.NS's 0.14% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TITAN.NS
Titan Company Limited		0.27%0.27%0.34%0.27%0.29%0.16%0.26%0.42%0.40%0.30%0.67%0.66%
TRENT.NS
Trent Limited		0.14%0.12%0.04%0.07%0.13%0.06%0.15%0.25%0.32%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TITAN.NS drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, smaller than the maximum TRENT.NS drawdown of -91.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TITAN.NS and TRENT.NS.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

TITAN.NSTRENT.NSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.10%

-91.01%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-46.99%

+35.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.63%

-59.91%

+31.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-59.91%

+18.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.38%

-57.14%

+50.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.86%

-32.47%

+7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

25.15%

-21.03%

Volatility

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Titan Company Limited (TITAN.NS) is 9.95%, while Trent Limited (TRENT.NS) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that TITAN.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRENT.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

TITAN.NSTRENT.NSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

13.22%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.26%

22.83%

-7.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

36.58%

-15.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

34.22%

-10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

35.89%

-6.69%

Financials

TITAN.NS vs. TRENT.NS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Titan Company Limited and Trent Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Values in INR except per share items