TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) and Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO).

TECH.TO and CANY.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TECH.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index. It was launched on May 4, 2021. CANY.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Sep 17, 2025.

Performance

TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) and Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD	-9.64%	-1.30%
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF	1.73%	5.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECH.TO achieves a -9.64% return, which is significantly lower than CANY.TO's 1.73% return.

TECH.TO

• 1D: 4.00%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -9.64%
• 6M: -9.79%
• 1Y: 17.00%
• 3Y*: 27.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CANY.TO

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TECH.TO and CANY.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

TECH.TO

Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD

CANY.TO

Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF

Return for Risk

TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECH.TO

TECH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 40
TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
TECH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TECH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 40
TECH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TECH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) and Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TECH.TO	CANY.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TECH.TO	CANY.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.83	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between TECH.TO and CANY.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO - Dividend Comparison

TECH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CANY.TO's 11.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD	0.12%	0.12%	0.14%	0.20%	0.35%	0.17%
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF	11.28%	5.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TECH.TO vs. CANY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECH.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.92%, which is greater than CANY.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECH.TO and CANY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TECH.TO	CANY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.92%	-8.34%	-39.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.06%	-3.83%	-9.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.66%	-2.48%	-10.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TECH.TO	CANY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.29%	18.03%	+5.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.64%	18.03%	+8.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.64%	18.03%	+8.61%