SWOBX vs. SWLGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWOBX (Schwab Balanced Fund™) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWOBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Over the past 5 years, SWOBX returned 6.93%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for SWLGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWOBX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.

Performance

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWOBX achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's 8.61% return.

SWOBX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 6M: 6.11%
• 1Y: 17.29%
• 3Y*: 13.39%
• 5Y*: 6.93%
• 10Y*: 8.92%

SWLGX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 7.15%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 27.46%
• 3Y*: 25.54%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™	6.26%	12.76%	12.51%	18.25%	-18.86%	14.76%	14.73%	20.13%	-4.35%	0.09%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	8.61%	18.55%	33.30%	42.67%	-29.17%	27.55%	38.43%	36.30%	-1.59%	-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SWOBX and SWLGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017	0.92

The correlation between SWOBX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWOBX	SWLGX
Technology	34.8%	51.4%
Industrials	11.1%	5.7%
Healthcare	10.7%	7.1%
Communication Services	10.0%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	13.2%
Financial Services	9.2%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	2.7%
Energy	4.0%	0.4%
Basic Materials	2.7%	0.3%
Utilities	2.6%	0.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.4%

Return for Risk

SWOBX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWOBX

SWOBX Risk / Return Rank: 51
SWOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SWOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SWOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SWOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SWOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

SWLGX

SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWOBX	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.85	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	2.50	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.32	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	1.76	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.90	5.92	+5.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWOBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWOBX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWOBX	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.85	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.75	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.80	-0.19

Drawdowns

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWOBX drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWOBX and SWLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWOBX	SWLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.99%	-32.69%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.58%	-16.16%	+9.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.72%	-23.30%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.30%	-32.69%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-7.05%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.48%	4.80%	-3.32%

Volatility

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) is 2.53%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that SWOBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWOBX	SWLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	3.30%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.74%	11.59%	-4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.58%	15.40%	-6.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.96%	21.49%	-7.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.88%	22.68%	-9.80%

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWOBX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWOBX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

SWOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than SWLGX's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.42%	0.46%	0.52%	0.67%	0.93%	1.76%	0.67%	0.96%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™	5.15%	5.47%	4.94%	5.67%	10.21%	6.47%	2.97%	5.21%	7.11%	3.20%	7.83%	7.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWOBX and SWLGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, SWOBX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SWOBX or SWLGX?

SWLGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to SWOBX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWOBX dropped -35.99% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWOBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.