PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWOBX vs. JABLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWOBX achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than JABLX's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SWOBX has underperformed JABLX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while JABLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.


SWOBX

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.80%
6M
2.88%
YTD
4.03%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
11.08%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
8.41%
ALL TIME*
7.16%

JABLX

1D
1.55%
1M
-0.36%
6M
2.58%
YTD
3.17%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
10.19%
ALL TIME*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWOBX
Schwab Balanced Fund™
4.03%12.76%12.51%18.25%-18.86%14.76%14.73%20.13%-4.35%15.52%
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
3.17%15.13%15.42%15.41%-16.36%17.20%14.21%22.60%0.68%18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SWOBX and JABLX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.93

The correlation between SWOBX and JABLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWOBX vs. JABLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWOBX
SWOBX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SWOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SWOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

JABLX
JABLX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JABLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
JABLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWOBXJABLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.05

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

4.43

+2.05

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWOBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the JABLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWOBX and JABLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWOBX drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, which is greater than JABLX's maximum drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWOBX and JABLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWOBXJABLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-27.07%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-8.10%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.72%

-11.89%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.30%

-21.30%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.30%

-22.47%

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-0.91%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-4.69%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.92%

-0.29%

Volatility

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) have volatilities of 2.69% and 2.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWOBXJABLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.67%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

7.69%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.37%

9.48%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

11.28%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.90%

11.15%

+1.75%

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWOBX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than JABLX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWOBX vs. JABLX - Dividend Comparison

SWOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than JABLX's 10.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
10.73%5.16%2.02%2.01%4.78%1.58%3.14%4.43%5.22%1.71%3.64%5.22%
SWOBX
Schwab Balanced Fund™
5.26%5.47%4.94%5.67%10.21%6.47%2.97%5.21%7.11%3.20%7.83%7.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SWOBX and JABLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWOBX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to JABLX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWOBX dropped -35.99% vs JABLX's -27.07%.

SWOBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWOBX and JABLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer