SWNRX vs. SWYMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SWNRX (Schwab Target 2050 Fund) and SWYMX (Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Charles Schwab. Over the past 5 years, SWNRX returned 9.09%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for SWYMX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWNRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWYMX.

Performance

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2050 Fund (SWNRX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWNRX achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than SWYMX's 11.75% return.

SWNRX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.95%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 12.08%
• 1Y: 26.12%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 9.09%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

SWYMX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 11.75%
• 6M: 12.78%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWNRX Schwab Target 2050 Fund	10.93%	19.56%	13.90%	20.65%	-19.60%	17.76%	15.28%	23.39%	-10.31%	22.98%
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund	11.75%	19.42%	14.24%	20.92%	-17.65%	17.80%	14.66%	25.34%	-7.58%	20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SWNRX and SWYMX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016	0.97

The correlation between SWNRX and SWYMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWNRX vs. SWYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWNRX

SWNRX Risk / Return Rank: 61
SWNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SWNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SWNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SWNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SWNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

SWYMX

SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Fund (SWNRX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWNRX	SWYMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.48	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.43	-0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.45	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.22	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.92	14.41	-1.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWNRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SWYMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWNRX and SWYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWNRX	SWYMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.48	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.68	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.75	-0.06

Drawdowns

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWNRX drawdown since its inception was -31.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SWYMX drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWNRX and SWYMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWNRX	SWYMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.50%	-30.48%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-8.55%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-14.95%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.18%	-25.37%	-5.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-4.51%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	1.91%	+0.16%

Volatility

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2050 Fund (SWNRX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWNRX	SWYMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	3.38%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	8.94%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.55%	11.28%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	14.72%	+1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.30%	15.63%	+0.67%

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWNRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWYMX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWNRX vs. SWYMX - Dividend Comparison

SWNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than SWYMX's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SWNRX Schwab Target 2050 Fund	4.43%	4.91%	3.33%	3.38%	8.27%	5.97%	2.35%	4.95%	6.51%	2.71%	5.34%	5.80%
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund	1.79%	2.00%	2.03%	1.99%	1.96%	1.78%	1.65%	1.96%	2.15%	1.43%	1.22%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWNRX and SWYMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, SWNRX and SWYMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SWNRX or SWYMX?

SWYMX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to SWNRX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWNRX dropped -31.50% vs SWYMX's -30.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.