SVPFX vs. MWMIX

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund (MWMIX).

SVPFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 28, 2021. MWMIX is managed by VanEck. It was launched on Nov 6, 2017.

Performance

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund (MWMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVPFX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than MWMIX's -6.81% return.

SVPFX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 8.48%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MWMIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -7.01%
• YTD: -6.81%
• 6M: -3.22%
• 1Y: 24.14%
• 3Y*: 8.78%
• 5Y*: 6.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund	1.08%	4.19%	3.82%	5.30%	-4.37%	0.78%
MWMIX VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund	-6.81%	13.17%	10.30%	25.20%	-13.46%	9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SVPFX and MWMIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVPFX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MWMIX's 0.59% expense ratio.

MWMIX

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund

SVPFX

Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund

Return for Risk

SVPFX vs. MWMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVPFX

SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 21
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

MWMIX

MWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
MWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
MWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
MWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund (MWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SVPFX	MWMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	0.55	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	0.92	-0.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.12	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	0.87	-0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	3.20	+0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVPFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the MWMIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVPFX and MWMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SVPFX	MWMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	0.55	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.53	-0.15

Drawdowns

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVPFX drawdown since its inception was -6.37%, smaller than the maximum MWMIX drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVPFX and MWMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVPFX	MWMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-33.03%	+26.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-12.42%	+9.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-10.33%	+10.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-4.76%	+2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	3.61%	-2.63%

Volatility

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) is 0.85%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund (MWMIX) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that SVPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVPFX	MWMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	4.81%	-3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.37%	9.98%	-8.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.00%	19.73%	-11.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.59%	18.54%	-12.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.59%	20.59%	-15.00%

Dividends

SVPFX vs. MWMIX - Dividend Comparison

SVPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than MWMIX's 13.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund	2.48%	1.83%	4.37%	4.29%	0.76%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MWMIX VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund	13.38%	12.47%	10.34%	0.77%	11.44%	13.44%	8.22%	10.84%	9.48%	0.26%