SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L).
SSLV.L and X7PP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSLV.L is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Apr 13, 2011. X7PP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Jul 7, 2009.
Performance
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 5.48% | 147.68% | 21.10% | -0.93% | 3.59% | -12.95% | 45.93% | 16.33% | -8.71% | 3.69% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | -4.74% | 101.94% | 24.95% | 29.78% | -5.30% | 27.99% | -16.01% | 12.68% | -29.67% | 26.42% |
Different Trading Currencies
SSLV.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLV.L achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than X7PP.L's -4.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLV.L has outperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 17.34%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.49% annualized return.
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -13.68%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 59.57%
- 1Y
- 123.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.20%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- 17.34%
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 5.08%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -4.74%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 46.08%
- 3Y*
- 43.35%
- 5Y*
- 26.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLV.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLV.L
X7PP.L
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLV.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 1.76 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 2.22 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.31 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.51 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 8.61 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLV.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.76 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.03 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.27 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLV.L and X7PP.L is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLV.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than X7PP.L's maximum drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLV.L and X7PP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLV.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -56.28% | -18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.61% | -15.94% | -24.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | -30.79% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | -56.28% | +13.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.62% | -9.93% | -23.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.49% | -15.54% | -36.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 4.48% | +8.61% |
Volatility
SSLV.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) at 10.12%. This indicates that SSLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSLV.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.21% | 10.12% | +8.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.88% | 17.85% | +34.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.89% | 26.05% | +27.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 26.14% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.24% | 27.42% | +2.82% |