SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L).
SSLV.L and FTWG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSLV.L is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Apr 13, 2011. FTWG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World Index. It was launched on Feb 20, 2024.
Performance
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 5.48% | 147.68% | 21.10% | 5.05% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | -1.63% | 22.73% | 17.92% | 8.17% |
Different Trading Currencies
SSLV.L is traded in USD, while FTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FTWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLV.L achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than FTWG.L's -1.63% return.
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -13.68%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 59.57%
- 1Y
- 123.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.20%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- 17.34%
FTWG.L
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLV.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLV.L
FTWG.L
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLV.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 1.41 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 1.96 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.31 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 9.54 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLV.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.41 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.28 | -1.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLV.L and FTWG.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison
SSLV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.37% | 1.34% | 1.50% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -16.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLV.L and FTWG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLV.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -17.78% | -56.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.61% | -10.16% | -30.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.62% | -4.05% | -29.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.49% | -2.06% | -50.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 1.87% | +11.22% |
Volatility
SSLV.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) at 5.21%. This indicates that SSLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSLV.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.21% | 5.21% | +13.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.88% | 9.03% | +42.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.89% | 15.49% | +38.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 13.13% | +21.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.24% | 13.13% | +17.11% |