SQQQ vs. PSLV
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while PSLV is a Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ returned -56.01%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for PSLV. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for PSLV.
Performance
SQQQ vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -45.27% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of -56.01%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.37%
- YTD
- -45.27%
- 6M
- -42.79%
- 1Y
- -65.16%
- 3Y*
- -56.19%
- 5Y*
- -49.17%
- 10Y*
- -56.01%
PSLV
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 100.09%
- 3Y*
- 41.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
SQQQ vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -45.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | -1.78% | 145.08% | 19.43% | -1.94% | 2.74% | -14.13% | 42.81% | 16.99% | -11.83% | 4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and PSLV is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010 | -0.15 |
The correlation between SQQQ and PSLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
PSLV
SQQQ vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQQQ | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.32 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.48 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | 5.50 | -7.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQQQ | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.37 | 1.72 | -3.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | 0.52 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.85 | 0.45 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | 0.17 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than PSLV's maximum drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and PSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -79.38% | -20.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.95% | -40.65% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.38% | -40.65% | -51.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.23% | -40.65% | -56.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -42.79% | -57.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -36.11% | -63.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -58.15% | -34.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.73% | 18.25% | +17.48% |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) is 13.75%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that SQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.75% | 16.57% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.45% | 57.35% | -20.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.79% | 58.49% | -10.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.64% | 35.64% | +31.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.11% | 31.14% | +34.97% |
SQQQ vs. PSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLV's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.48% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQQQ and PSLV have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to SQQQ (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs PSLV's -79.38%.
On 10-year performance, PSLV leads with 13.97% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSLV has performed better with a 13.97% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.
SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PSLV is Silver. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.51% for PSLV.
PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and PSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer