SPYX vs. BUFP
Compare and contrast key facts about State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP).
SPYX and BUFP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPYX is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2015. BUFP is a passively managed fund by PGIM that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024. Both SPYX and BUFP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPYX vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPYX vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | -5.39% | 17.87% | 9.18% |
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | -1.34% | 12.92% | 6.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly lower than BUFP's -1.34% return.
SPYX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -2.85%
- 1Y
- 17.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
BUFP
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 13.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPYX vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPYX vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank
SPYX
BUFP
SPYX vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYX | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.86 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.71 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 9.81 | -3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYX | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.02 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYX and BUFP is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPYX vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison
SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.98% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPYX vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and BUFP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYX | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -11.98% | -20.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.82% | -8.16% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.14% | -2.54% | -4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -1.08% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 1.42% | +1.21% |
Volatility
SPYX vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 3.41%. This indicates that SPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPYX | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 3.41% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 4.99% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 11.11% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 9.79% | +7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 9.79% | +8.20% |