PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPF1.DE vs. BMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (SPF1.DE) and REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

SPF1.DE is traded in EUR, while BMAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BMAX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPF1.DE achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly higher than BMAX's 1.21% return.


SPF1.DE

1D
3.28%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
4.46%
6M
8.14%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*

BMAX

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
1.21%
6M
-19.09%
1Y
-17.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPF1.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BMAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPF1.DE
SPF1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SPF1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPF1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPF1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SPF1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPF1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BMAX
BMAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (SPF1.DE) and REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPF1.DEBMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

-0.54

+2.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

-0.61

+3.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.93

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

-0.47

+3.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.76

-0.79

+15.55

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPF1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the BMAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPF1.DE and BMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPF1.DEBMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

-0.54

+2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

-0.52

+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between SPF1.DE and BMAX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPF1.DE nor BMAX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPF1.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, smaller than the maximum BMAX drawdown of -32.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPF1.DE and BMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPF1.DEBMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

-31.32%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-31.32%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-28.90%

+25.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.55%

-15.10%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

18.53%

-16.89%

Volatility

SPF1.DE vs. BMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (SPF1.DE) is 5.68%, while REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that SPF1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPF1.DEBMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

6.11%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

19.63%

-10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

33.38%

-20.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.57%

33.91%

-23.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.61%

33.91%

-22.30%