PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXL vs. LABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXL vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 567.48% return, which is significantly higher than LABU's 3.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXL has outperformed LABU with an annualized return of 65.39%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively lower -13.53% annualized return.


SOXL

1D
5.34%
1M
119.95%
YTD
567.48%
6M
502.28%
1Y
1,438.30%
3Y*
135.13%
5Y*
48.72%
10Y*
65.39%

LABU

1D
4.61%
1M
-11.09%
YTD
3.80%
6M
3.63%
1Y
195.85%
3Y*
7.82%
5Y*
-32.76%
10Y*
-13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXL vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
567.48%54.91%-12.31%226.98%-85.66%118.84%70.04%231.83%-39.07%141.71%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
3.80%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXL and LABU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.51

The correlation between SOXL and LABU shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOXL vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SOXL
LABU

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

99.8%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

SOXL
100.0%
LABU

-

Basic Materials

SOXL

-

LABU
0.0%

Communication Services

SOXL

-

LABU

-

Consumer Cyclical

SOXL

-

LABU

-

Consumer Defensive

SOXL

-

LABU

-

Energy

SOXL

-

LABU

-

Financial Services

SOXL

-

LABU
0.2%

Healthcare

SOXL

-

LABU
99.8%

Industrials

SOXL

-

LABU

-

Real Estate

SOXL

-

LABU

-

Utilities

SOXL

-

LABU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXL vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXL vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOXLLABUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+11.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.35

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

33.47

6.42

+27.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

114.79

18.77

+96.02

SOXL vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXL Sharpe Ratio is 14.28, which is higher than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXL and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOXLLABUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28

2.60

+11.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

-0.34

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

-0.14

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.24

+0.75

Drawdowns

SOXL vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and LABU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXLLABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.46%

-99.18%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.47%

-30.70%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.88%

-78.30%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.46%

-97.59%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.46%

-98.96%

+8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-96.34%

+96.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-81.68%

+46.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.65%

10.48%

+2.17%

Volatility

SOXL vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 40.82% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) at 27.83%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXLLABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.82%

27.83%

+12.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

81.29%

59.70%

+21.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.11%

75.91%

+26.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.25%

95.58%

+11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.04%

95.42%

+3.62%

SOXL vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOXL vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than LABU's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.74%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%0.00%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXL and LABU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to LABU (27.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs LABU's -99.18%.

On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 65.39% vs -13.53% for LABU. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, LABU has been the lower-risk option at 27.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 65.39% return vs -13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index, while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 1.12% for LABU.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXL and LABU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer