PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SOXL.L
Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
14.83%11.41%-36.16%
AMZD.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP
-19.81%4.58%14.80%
Different Trading Currencies

SOXL.L is traded in USD, while AMZD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMZD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXL.L achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than AMZD.L's -19.81% return.


SOXL.L

1D
-2.86%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
14.83%
6M
20.98%
1Y
206.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZD.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.24%
YTD
-19.81%
6M
-17.17%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AMZD.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXL.L
SOXL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SOXL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZD.L
AMZD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOXL.LAMZD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

-0.23

+1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

-0.12

+2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.98

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.57

-0.01

+6.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.94

-0.02

+19.96

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXL.L and AMZD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOXL.LAMZD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

-0.23

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.09

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between SOXL.L and AMZD.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Dividend Comparison

SOXL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.71%.


Drawdowns

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXL.L drawdown since its inception was -95.66%, which is greater than AMZD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL.L and AMZD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXL.LAMZD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.66%

-29.73%

-65.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.95%

-28.42%

-23.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.16%

-27.31%

-39.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.19%

-11.88%

-52.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.11%

11.85%

+5.26%

Volatility

SOXL.L vs. AMZD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L) has a higher volatility of 45.03% compared to IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) at 7.20%. This indicates that SOXL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SOXL.LAMZD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.03%

7.20%

+37.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

97.24%

22.03%

+75.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

136.68%

29.42%

+107.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.62%

28.16%

+103.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

131.62%

28.16%

+103.46%