PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SO vs. UEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SO vs. UEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Southern Company (SO) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SO achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than UEC's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SO has underperformed UEC with an annualized return of 10.55%, while UEC has yielded a comparatively higher 31.30% annualized return.


SO

1D
-0.02%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
5.45%
6M
4.52%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
10.55%

UEC

1D
-8.74%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
20.63%
6M
8.80%
1Y
121.54%
3Y*
66.37%
5Y*
33.60%
10Y*
31.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SO vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SO
The Southern Company
5.45%9.47%21.72%2.21%8.24%16.34%0.63%51.65%-3.75%2.42%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
20.63%74.59%4.53%64.95%15.82%90.34%91.47%-26.46%-29.38%58.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SO and UEC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2007

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SO:

$102.07B

UEC:

$6.82B

EPS

SO:

$3.92

UEC:

-$0.18

PS Ratio

SO:

3.34

UEC:

324.99

PB Ratio

SO:

2.75

UEC:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

SO:

$30.17B

UEC:

$20.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SO:

$13.01B

UEC:

$5.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

SO:

$14.44B

UEC:

-$104.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SO vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SO
SO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SO vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Southern Company (SO) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOUECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.26

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

2.99

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

5.98

-5.30

SO vs. UEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SO Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the UEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SO and UEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOUECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.62

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.46

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.43

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.05

+0.57

Drawdowns

SO vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SO drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SO and UEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOUECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-97.40%

+58.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-40.86%

+25.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.99%

-53.49%

+38.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.28%

-63.76%

+40.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.43%

-80.59%

+42.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-30.04%

+22.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-62.12%

+55.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.32%

20.41%

-14.09%

Volatility

SO vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Southern Company (SO) is 5.85%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 27.23%. This indicates that SO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOUECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

27.23%

-21.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

57.08%

-44.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

76.21%

-60.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.64%

74.08%

-55.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

73.87%

-51.93%

Dividends

SO vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison

SO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SO
The Southern Company
3.29%3.37%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SO vs. UEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Southern Company and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
20.20M
(SO) Total Revenue
(UEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SO and UEC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEC has higher volatility (27.23%) compared to SO (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SO dropped -38.43% vs UEC's -97.40%.

UEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SO and UEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer