SO vs. ED
SO (The Southern Company) and ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Utilities - Regulated Electric industry within the Utilities sector. Over the past 10 years, SO returned 10.55%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for ED. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SO vs. ED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SO achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than ED's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SO has outperformed ED with an annualized return of 10.55%, while ED has yielded a comparatively lower 6.98% annualized return.
SO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
ED
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
SO vs. ED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SO The Southern Company | 5.45% | 9.47% | 21.72% | 2.21% | 8.24% | 16.34% | 0.63% | 51.65% | -3.75% | 2.42% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 5.89% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SO and ED is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1982 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SO and ED shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SO:
$102.07B
ED:
$37.71B
SO:
$3.92
ED:
$5.94
SO:
23.08
ED:
17.41
SO:
1.43
ED:
1.24
SO:
3.34
ED:
2.18
SO:
2.75
ED:
1.61
SO:
$30.17B
ED:
$17.22B
SO:
$13.01B
ED:
$11.62B
SO:
$14.44B
ED:
$8.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SO vs. ED — Risk / Return Rank
SO
ED
SO vs. ED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Southern Company (SO) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SO | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 0.37 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 0.81 | -0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SO | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.22 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.53 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.33 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.36 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SO vs. ED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SO drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum ED drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SO and ED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SO | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -78.90% | +40.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -9.63% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.99% | -17.36% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.28% | -22.03% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.43% | -30.91% | -7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.94% | -9.63% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -13.24% | +6.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | 4.43% | +1.89% |
Volatility
SO vs. ED - Volatility Comparison
The Southern Company (SO) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) at 5.01%. This indicates that SO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SO | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 5.01% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 11.85% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 16.33% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 18.73% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 20.99% | +0.95% |
Dividends
SO vs. ED - Dividend Comparison
SO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than ED's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.36% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
SO The Southern Company | 3.29% | 3.37% | 3.47% | 3.96% | 3.78% | 3.82% | 4.13% | 3.86% | 5.42% | 4.78% | 4.52% | 4.60% |
Financials
SO vs. ED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Southern Company and Consolidated Edison, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SO vs. ED - Profitability Comparison
SO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.
ED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.
SO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
ED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
SO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
ED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 924.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SO and ED have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SO has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to ED (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SO dropped -38.43% vs ED's -78.90%.
SO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SO and ED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer