SECT vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
SECT and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SECT is an actively managed fund by Main Management. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
SECT vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SECT vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | -6.08% | 17.80% | 18.61% | 21.10% | -12.80% | 28.88% | 15.65% | 28.06% | -9.66% | 9.39% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | -9.40% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 15.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECT achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -9.40% return.
SECT
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- -3.67%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- —
XLF
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- 0.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SECT vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SECT vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
SECT
XLF
SECT vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECT | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.03 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 0.18 | +1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.02 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.13 | +1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 0.38 | +5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECT | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.03 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.50 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.20 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between SECT and XLF is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SECT vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than XLF's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | 0.71% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 0.77% | 1.67% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.60% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
SECT vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and XLF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECT | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.09% | -82.69% | +44.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.44% | -14.79% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | -25.81% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -12.01% | +3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -20.10% | +15.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 4.90% | -1.89% |
Volatility
SECT vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 4.75%. This indicates that SECT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SECT | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.75% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 11.45% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 19.29% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 18.69% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 22.19% | -1.94% |