SECT vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
SECT and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SECT is an actively managed fund by Main Management. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SECT or XLF.
Performance
SECT vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECT achieves a 20.03% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 34.95% return.
SECT
20.03%
2.74%
10.79%
26.39%
14.16%
N/A
XLF
34.95%
6.41%
22.22%
44.58%
13.14%
11.90%
Key characteristics
| SECT | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.83 | 3.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.46 | 4.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.27 | 3.79 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.82 | 23.39 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.10% | 1.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.71% | 13.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.09% | -82.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.07% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SECT vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SECT and XLF is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SECT vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SECT vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than XLF's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | 0.35% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 0.77% | 1.68% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.33% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
SECT vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SECT vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is 5.16%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that SECT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.