PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Scalable MSCI AC World Xtrackers UCITS ETF 1C (SCWX.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCWX.DE achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly higher than XNGI.DE's -10.58% return.


SCWX.DE

1D
2.27%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
2.94%
1Y
13.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XNGI.DE

1D
2.69%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-11.67%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCWX.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XNGI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCWX.DE
SCWX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCWX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCWX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCWX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCWX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCWX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XNGI.DE
XNGI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scalable MSCI AC World Xtrackers UCITS ETF 1C (SCWX.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCWX.DEXNGI.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.28

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

0.55

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

0.32

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.77

0.87

+5.90

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCWX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCWX.DE and XNGI.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCWX.DEXNGI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.28

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.83

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between SCWX.DE and XNGI.DE is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SCWX.DE nor XNGI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCWX.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, smaller than the maximum XNGI.DE drawdown of -27.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCWX.DE and XNGI.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SCWX.DEXNGI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-27.91%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-18.97%

+5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-16.19%

+12.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-6.28%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

6.93%

-4.91%

Volatility

SCWX.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Scalable MSCI AC World Xtrackers UCITS ETF 1C (SCWX.DE) is 4.60%, while Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that SCWX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNGI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SCWX.DEXNGI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

6.01%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

13.68%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

22.54%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

20.73%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

20.73%

-4.77%